About The Author

I am a Year 1 Computer Engineering Undergraduate at the National University of Singapore. Computers, Robots, and other Technology-related (more...)

Get The Latest Posts

Sign up to receive latest news

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Taking a Look at Myself, Literally




While recording the video last Wednesday, I was a bit conscious.  Being aware of the situation that whatever happens during the video will be watched afterwards, I did my best to look appropriate.  I felt that this circumstance led me to deviate some of my focus from the topic at hand.  During the first few minutes, this was the case.  After a short while, I felt that the discussion became more natural and it seemed that things were falling into the right places.
While watching the video, I was amused.  That is me!?!  Hahas!  One major action that I noticed myself doing was smiling which I did a lot during the meeting.  It was even accompanied by a few laughs here and there.  This might have caused distractions for my team mates.  Everything else looks fine.  My thoughts during the recording of the video did not really show in my actual actions.
Regarding the role that I played in the meeting, I feel that I satisfactorily carried out my job as the team leader.  I found it challenging to start the meeting, though.  It was like starting a fire with the use of wooden sticks and dry leaves.  I had to heat it up first to obtain a burning exchange of ideas.  Throughout the meeting, I knew that I was able to hold everyone to focus towards the things that the team had to discuss and finish debating about.  A few sidetracking moments were successfully put back into place.
After reviewing the video, I strongly believe that our team did an excellent job for this particular meeting.  It was efficient and effective.  Everyone was prompt for the meeting and brought everything that was required of them.  Everyone had their share of ideas.  While the meeting did not take too much time to finish, from analyzing the problem to the laying down of groundwork for the solution and the writing of the final proposal, everything was successfully discussed during the meeting.  Every item on the agenda was successfully resolved.
A job well-done, team mates!  Thank you!

»»  read more

Sunday, February 7, 2010

It Takes Two to Tango, Three to Have a Spectator




It was Wednesday. Five days before the submission deadline.
Jack was delaying the team. He was able to send in his part of the code for the team project only now. According to the team’s Gantt chart, it should have been sent a week ago. He had his reasons: he got sick. Valid, but he didn’t try to keep in touch during those times - no email replies, no return calls, and, this was not the first time he suddenly went missing in action.
Jack, John and you combined the team’s 2,000 lines of code and tested it.
It was not working properly.
For the next two days, debugging was the issue. No one could find the root cause of the problem.
Friday. Three days before the deadline.
By Monday, the program should have been working and running in perfect condition for demonstration. During class, a hardcopy of the thirty page final report shall be submitted and a group oral defence shall be done.
Due to the record of Jack’s lack of team involvement, John, an experienced programmer, suggested to redo Jack’s code with you since he suspected that Jack’s code was causing the problem.
Saturday. Two days away from the submission deadline.
Confirmed. Since the new code is now working perfectly fine with John’s and your original codes, Jack’s code has had the problem. He admitted that he rushed his code. This made you and John upset. Obviously, both of you observed that Jack is not putting as much effort into this project as everyone else does. John and you are both feeling resentment against Jack while the latter remains in his usual self. He seems to be free-riding all the while since everyone will be receiving the same grade, anyway.
Less than 48 crucial hours left before the submission deadline.
The final report is yet to be made and everyone has to be prepped for the oral defence.
 

As the leader of the team, how will you divide the composition of the final report? Will you still entrust a portion of the final project content to Jack? How will you deal with him?


REFERENCE
1. Tokka Week: 4. Two to Tango (Edited Image Source): http://empty-smile.deviantart.com/art/Tokka-Week-4-Two-to-Tango-93737149
2. Blue Pills (Edited Image Source): http://empty-smile.deviantart.com/art/Blue-Pills-98896709

»»  read more